pad: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.55
Siblings elbow pad
Weight: 0.74
, knee pad
Weight: 0.61
, keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, stylus
Weight: 0.33
, joystick
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at desk 0.78
be at your desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, be at office)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, be at your desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(keyboard, be at office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(keyboard, be at office)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(keyboard, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(keyboard, be at desk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(keyboard, be at your desk)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(keyboard, be at your desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pad, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pad, be at desk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at desk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pad, be at desk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(pad, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pad, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(keyboard, be at desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(keyboard, be at office)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pad, be at office)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(keyboard, be at your desk)