pager: be used to communication

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
, cell phone
Weight: 0.60
, radio
Weight: 0.50
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.36
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to communication 1.00
be used to entertainment or for communication 0.88
be used to communicate 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radio, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pager, be used to communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(radio, be used to entertainment or for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pager, be used to communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(radio, be used to communication)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(radio, be used to entertainment or for communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(radio, be used to communication)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(radio, be used to entertainment or for communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be used to communication)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be used to communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(radio, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pager, be used to communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(radio, be used to entertainment or for communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pager, be used to communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(cellphone, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be used to communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mobile phone, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be used to communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pager, be used to communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pager, be used to communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(radio, be used to communication)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(radio, be used to entertainment or for communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cellphone, be used to communication)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be used to communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(radio, be used to communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(pager, be used to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(radio, be used to entertainment or for communication)