pager: is examples

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
, cell phone
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.36
, network device
Weight: 0.35
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.35
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is examples 1.00
is example 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(electronic device, is examples)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pager, is examples)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(device, is examples)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pager, is examples)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(device, is examples)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is examples)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(device, is examples)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(electronic device, is examples)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pager, is examples)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(device, is examples)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pager, is examples)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pager, is examples)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pager, is example)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pager, is example)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pager, is example)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pager, is example)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pager, is examples)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pager, is examples)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(device, is examples)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(electronic device, is examples)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(device, is examples)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pager, is examples)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(electronic device, is examples)