pail: be at wish well

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.57
, article
Weight: 0.54
, item
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings jug
Weight: 0.35
, jar
Weight: 0.34
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, tub
Weight: 0.34
, cup
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wish well 1.00
do not work well 0.84
be at we do not understand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pail, be at wish well)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pail, be at wish well)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pail, be at wish well)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pail, be at wish well)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pail, be at wish well)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pail, be at wish well)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pail, be at wish well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(pail, be at wish well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)