paint: be in cigaretts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, chemical compound
Weight: 0.59
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.59
Siblings oil painting
Weight: 0.68
, nail polish
Weight: 0.64
, ink
Weight: 0.57
, enamel
Weight: 0.57
, whitewash
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cigaretts 1.00
be electrolysed 0.88
be man-made 0.88
use are by living things returned 0.77
use are by things returned 0.77
use are by living things 0.76
use are by things 0.76
was made in 1800s 0.76
was made in times 0.76
have added last 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chemical compound, be man-made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paint, be in cigaretts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chemical compound, be man-made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chemical compound, be man-made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ink, was made in 1800s)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chemical compound, be man-made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(paint, be in cigaretts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ink, was made in 1800s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ink, was made in 1800s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(paint, be in cigaretts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paint, be in cigaretts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(paint, be in cigaretts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chemical compound, be man-made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ink, was made in 1800s)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(paint, be in cigaretts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chemical compound, be man-made)