:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(artist, paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(painter, do paint)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(artist, paint)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(artist, paint)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(painter, paint)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(painter, paint)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(painter, paint)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(painter, paint)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(artist, paint)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(painter, do paint)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(artist, paint)