painter: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.72
, poet
Weight: 0.68
, craftsman
Weight: 0.66
, occupation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings frank stella
Weight: 0.62
, sculptor
Weight: 0.61
, constable
Weight: 0.60
, turner
Weight: 0.55
, hopper
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheap 0.79
has quality cost 0.77
is attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sculptor, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hopper, is cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sculptor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sculptor, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hopper, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hopper, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(painter, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(painter, has quality cost)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(painter, has quality cost)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(painter, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(painter, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(painter, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(painter, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sculptor, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(painter, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hopper, is cheap)