painting: be than better photography

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
Siblings oil painting
Weight: 0.72
, photograph
Weight: 0.64
, sketch
Weight: 0.64
, canvas
Weight: 0.62
, last supper
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than better photography 1.00
be than photography 0.97
be easier than arts 0.78
be easier than fine arts 0.77
be as art 0.77
is art 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(art, is art)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, be than better photography)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(art, is art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, is art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(art, is art)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(painting, be than better photography)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(painting, be than better photography)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(painting, be than photography)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(painting, be than photography)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(painting, be than photography)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(painting, be as art)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(painting, is art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(painting, be as art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(painting, is art)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(painting, be than photography)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(painting, be easier than arts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(painting, be easier than fine arts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(painting, be as art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(painting, is art)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(painting, be easier than fine arts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(painting, be easier than fine arts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(painting, be easier than fine arts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(painting, be easier than arts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(painting, be easier than arts)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(painting, be easier than arts)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(painting, be as art)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(painting, is art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, be than better photography)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(art, is art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, be than better photography)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(art, is art)