pair: be at pant in drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hand
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.55
, fish
Weight: 0.54
, item
Weight: 0.53
Siblings couple
Weight: 0.60
, young man
Weight: 0.33
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.32
, two
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at pant in drawer 1.00
be at pant in store 0.91
be at pant in suitecase 0.91
be at pant in bedroom 0.89
be at pant in cabinet 0.89
be at pant in bureau drawer 0.89
be at pant in wardrobe 0.87
be at pant in clothe store 0.87
be at pant in department store 0.86
be at pant in wash machine 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in store)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in suitecase)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in wardrobe)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in cabinet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in bureau drawer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in bedroom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in clothe store)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in department store)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in wash machine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in bureau drawer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in bedroom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in suitecase)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in wash machine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in cabinet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in bedroom)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in bureau drawer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in wash machine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in wardrobe)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in clothe store)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in department store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in department store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in bedroom)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in clothe store)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in wash machine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in bureau drawer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in cabinet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in department store)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in suitecase)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in cabinet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in clothe store)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pair, be at pant in wardrobe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in store)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in suitecase)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pair, be at pant in wardrobe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pair, be at pant in drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pair, be at pant in drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pair, be at pant in drawer)