palate: has state sore

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.57
, flavor
Weight: 0.55
, neck
Weight: 0.53
, coffee
Weight: 0.50
, throat
Weight: 0.49
Siblings caramel
Weight: 0.33
, uvula
Weight: 0.33
, pear
Weight: 0.33
, raspberry
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state sore 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(throat, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(palate, has state sore)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(neck, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(palate, has state sore)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(neck, has state sore)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(throat, has state sore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(neck, has state sore)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(throat, has state sore)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(throat, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(palate, has state sore)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(neck, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(palate, has state sore)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(palate, has state sore)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(palate, has state sore)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(palate, has state sore)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(neck, has state sore)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(throat, has state sore)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(neck, has state sore)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(palate, has state sore)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(throat, has state sore)