pan: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.80
, wok
Weight: 0.56
, skillet
Weight: 0.53
, baking sheet
Weight: 0.49
, saucepan
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
get hot 0.96
is when hot 0.94
is really hot 0.90
is when really hot 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wok, get hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wok, get hot)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(wok, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pan, is hot)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pan, is when really hot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pan, is when really hot)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pan, is when really hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pan, is when really hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pan, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pan, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pan, is hot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wok, get hot)