pan: need size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.80
, wok
Weight: 0.56
, skillet
Weight: 0.53
, baking sheet
Weight: 0.49
, saucepan
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
need size 1.00
is size 0.95
need correct size 0.88
is correct size 0.84
is sizes 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, is size)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, is sizes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(saucepan, is size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(saucepan, is size)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(saucepan, is sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(saucepan, is sizes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pan, need size)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pan, is size)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pan, is size)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pan, is size)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pan, need correct size)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pan, need correct size)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pan, need size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, need size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(saucepan, is size)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pan, need size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(saucepan, is sizes)