panama: be good place visit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.63
, south america
Weight: 0.62
, central american country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.58
, central america
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, north america
Weight: 0.35
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.35
, south africa
Weight: 0.35
, mexico
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place visit 1.00
be good place live 0.84
was ideal place for construction 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(puerto rico, be good place visit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be good place visit)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexico, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(puerto rico, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(puerto rico, be good place visit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mexico city, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be good place visit)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexico, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mexico, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mexico city, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(panama, be good place visit)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(panama, be good place live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(panama, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(panama, was ideal place for construction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(panama, was ideal place for construction)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(panama, be good place live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(panama, was ideal place for construction)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(panama, was ideal place for construction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(panama, be good place visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(puerto rico, be good place visit)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mexico city, be good place visit)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mexico city, be good place live)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(panama, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mexico, be good place live)