pancake: taste different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents recipe
Weight: 0.67
, cake
Weight: 0.66
, bread
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, dish
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, sausage
Weight: 0.35
, wedding cake
Weight: 0.35
, tortilla
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste different 1.00
taste eggy 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sausage, taste different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wedding cake, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wedding cake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wedding cake, taste different)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sausage, taste different)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sausage, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pancake, taste different)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pancake, taste eggy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pancake, taste eggy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pancake, taste eggy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pancake, taste eggy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pancake, taste different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pancake, taste different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wedding cake, taste different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pancake, taste different)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sausage, taste different)