pancreas: be considered dual gland

Related concepts

Parents	endocrine gland Weight: 0.71 , gland Weight: 0.67 , endocrine system Weight: 0.65 , organ Weight: 0.62 , tumor Weight: 0.57
Siblings	adrenal gland Weight: 0.39 , salivary gland Weight: 0.39 , pineal gland Weight: 0.38 , sebaceous gland Weight: 0.38 , prostate gland Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered dual gland	1.00
be called dual gland	0.99
is dual gland	0.99
be called dual function gland	0.96
be considered as heterocrine gland	0.93
be considered gland	0.93
be known as gland	0.91
be known as heterocrine gland	0.91
be called gland	0.90
be called heterocrine gland	0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(gland, be called gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(endocrine gland, be called gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(endocrine gland, be called gland)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(gland, be called gland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(gland, be called gland)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(endocrine gland, be called gland)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(adrenal gland, be called gland)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(gland, be called gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(endocrine gland, be called gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(adrenal gland, be called gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(adrenal gland, be called gland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(pancreas, is dual gland)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(pancreas, be called dual gland)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(pancreas, be considered gland)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(pancreas, be called gland)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be called dual gland)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, is dual gland)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be called dual function gland)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(pancreas, is dual gland)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered as heterocrine gland)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be called heterocrine gland)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(pancreas, be known as gland)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be known as heterocrine gland)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered gland)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be called dual gland)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(pancreas, is dual gland)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be called gland)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be known as gland)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be called gland)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(pancreas, be called dual gland)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be considered gland)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(pancreas, be called dual function gland)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(pancreas, be called gland)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(pancreas, be considered gland)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(pancreas, be called dual function gland)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be called dual function gland)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be known as gland)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(pancreas, be known as gland)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(pancreas, be considered as heterocrine gland)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(pancreas, be called heterocrine gland)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(pancreas, be known as heterocrine gland)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be considered as heterocrine gland)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be called heterocrine gland)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(pancreas, be known as heterocrine gland)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(pancreas, be considered as heterocrine gland)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(pancreas, be called heterocrine gland)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(pancreas, be known as heterocrine gland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(endocrine gland, be called gland)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(gland, be called gland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(adrenal gland, be called gland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(endocrine gland, be called gland)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(pancreas, be considered dual gland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(gland, be called gland)