pancreas: fail produce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endocrine gland
Weight: 0.71
, gland
Weight: 0.67
, endocrine system
Weight: 0.65
, organ
Weight: 0.62
, tumor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings adrenal gland
Weight: 0.39
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.39
, pineal gland
Weight: 0.38
, sebaceous gland
Weight: 0.38
, prostate gland
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail produce 1.00
fail 0.92
simply can fail directly because of age 0.78
simply can fail directly because of old age 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organ, simply can fail directly because of old age)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pancreas, fail produce)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(organ, simply can fail directly because of old age)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(organ, simply can fail directly because of old age)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organ, simply can fail directly because of old age)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pancreas, fail produce)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(pancreas, fail produce)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pancreas, fail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pancreas, fail)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, fail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pancreas, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, fail produce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pancreas, fail produce)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(organ, simply can fail directly because of old age)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pancreas, fail produce)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(organ, simply can fail directly because of old age)