panda bear: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.73
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, artist
Weight: 0.59
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings panda
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.40
, giant panda
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.39
, bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(panda bear, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(panda bear, has quality jokes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, has quality jokes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(panda bear, has quality jokes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panda bear, has quality jokes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(panda bear, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(panda bear, has quality bad)