panda: was white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, bear
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.41
, giant panda
Weight: 0.40
, red panda
Weight: 0.40
, orangutan
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was white 1.00
has color white 0.90
has color black 0.86
has color red 0.80
have black eyes 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has color white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, was white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, has color red)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, was white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(bear, has color white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, was white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bear, has color black)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, was white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bear, has color white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bear, has color black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has color white)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bear, has color white)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bear, has color black)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has color white)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, has color black)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, has color black)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, have black eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has color white)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(panda, was white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(bear, has color white)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(panda, was white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bear, has color black)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(panda, was white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, has color red)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(panda, was white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red panda, has color white)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red panda, has color white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(giant panda, has color white)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(giant panda, has color white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant panda, has color black)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(giant panda, has color black)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(panda bear, has color black)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(panda bear, has color black)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(panda bear, has color white)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(panda bear, has color white)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(red panda, has color red)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red panda, has color red)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(giant panda, have black eyes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(giant panda, have black eyes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(orangutan, has color red)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(orangutan, has color red)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(panda, was white)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(panda, has color black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(panda, has color black)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(panda, has color black)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(panda, has color white)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(panda, has color black)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(panda, has color white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(panda, has color white)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(panda, has color white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(panda, has color red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(panda, have black eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(panda, have black eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(panda, have black eyes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(panda, have black eyes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(panda, has color red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(panda, has color red)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(panda, has color red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(panda, was white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bear, has color white)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has color white)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bear, has color black)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red panda, has color white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(red panda, has color red)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(giant panda, has color black)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(panda bear, has color black)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(giant panda, has color white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(panda bear, has color white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(giant panda, have black eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(orangutan, has color red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bear, has color white)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has color white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bear, has color black)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(panda, was white)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, has color red)