panel: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
Siblings eminent domain
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.31
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.31
, topic
Weight: 0.31
, moderator
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
is hot cash 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(panel, get hot)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(topic, is hot cash)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(panel, get hot)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(topic, is hot cash)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(topic, is hot cash)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(panel, get hot)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(panel, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(panel, get hot)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(panel, get hot)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(panel, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(panel, get hot)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(panel, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(panel, get hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(topic, is hot cash)