panel: work better in cold

Related concepts

Parents	board Weight: 0.64 , issue Weight: 0.61 , project Weight: 0.59 , application Weight: 0.58
Siblings	eminent domain Weight: 0.32 , court case Weight: 0.31 , hearing aid Weight: 0.31 , topic Weight: 0.31 , moderator Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
work better in cold	1.00
work	0.76
go bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(application, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(panel, work better in cold)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(project, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(panel, work better in cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(project, work)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(application, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(project, work)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(application, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(application, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(panel, work better in cold)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(project, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(panel, work better in cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(panel, work better in cold)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(panel, go bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(panel, go bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(panel, go bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(panel, work)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(panel, go bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(panel, work)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(panel, work)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(panel, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(panel, work better in cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(panel, work better in cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(project, work)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(application, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(project, work)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(panel, work better in cold) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(application, work)