pangaea: was called pangaea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.34
Siblings sonic youth
Weight: 0.24
, orchestra
Weight: 0.24
, rubber band
Weight: 0.24
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.24
, jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
was called pangaea 1.00
be called 311 0.92
be called pangaea 0.92
was made 0.83
was discovered 0.79
was form 0.77
is imoprtant 0.77
is vetements 0.77
is hbcu 0.77
was considered controversial 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(band, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pangaea, was called pangaea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(band, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(band, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, was considered controversial)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(orchestra, is vetements)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, was discovered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, was discovered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(band, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(orchestra, is vetements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(orchestra, is vetements)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ozzy osbourne, was discovered)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, was discovered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, was discovered)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, was considered controversial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ozzy osbourne, was considered controversial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pangaea, was called pangaea)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, be called pangaea)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pangaea, be called pangaea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was form)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, is imoprtant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pangaea, was form)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pangaea, be called pangaea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pangaea, be called pangaea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pangaea, was form)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(pangaea, is imoprtant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pangaea, was form)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pangaea, is imoprtant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pangaea, is imoprtant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pangaea, was called pangaea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(band, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(orchestra, is vetements)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, was discovered)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ozzy osbourne, was considered controversial)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ozzy osbourne, was discovered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(pangaea, was called pangaea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(band, was made)