pantheon: be important in paris

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monument
Weight: 0.55
, landmark
Weight: 0.53
, place
Weight: 0.53
, historical site
Weight: 0.48
, church
Weight: 0.47
Siblings national monument
Weight: 0.33
, statue
Weight: 0.32
, memorial
Weight: 0.31
, temple
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in paris 1.00
be in paris 0.98
paris 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(statue, be in paris)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(statue, be in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(statue, be in paris)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(pantheon, be important in paris)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pantheon, be in paris)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pantheon, paris)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(pantheon, paris)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pantheon, be in paris)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pantheon, be in paris)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pantheon, paris)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, paris)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, be in paris)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, be important in paris)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pantheon, be important in paris)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, be important in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(statue, be in paris)