pantheon: has physical part hole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monument
Weight: 0.55
, landmark
Weight: 0.53
, place
Weight: 0.53
, historical site
Weight: 0.48
, church
Weight: 0.47
Siblings national monument
Weight: 0.33
, statue
Weight: 0.32
, memorial
Weight: 0.31
, temple
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hole 1.00
have bullet holes 0.77
has physical part dome 0.77
has physical part oculus 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pantheon, has physical part hole)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, have bullet holes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, has physical part oculus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(pantheon, have bullet holes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pantheon, has physical part oculus)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, has physical part dome)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pantheon, has physical part dome)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pantheon, has physical part dome)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pantheon, has physical part dome)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pantheon, have bullet holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pantheon, has physical part oculus)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pantheon, has physical part oculus)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pantheon, have bullet holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pantheon, has physical part hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pantheon, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pantheon, has physical part hole)