panting: be effective way losing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sign
Weight: 0.49
, symptom
Weight: 0.41
, activity
Weight: 0.41
, method
Weight: 0.38
, problem
Weight: 0.37
Siblings sweating
Weight: 0.32
, stop sign
Weight: 0.30
, coughing
Weight: 0.30
, sweat
Weight: 0.30
, exhaustion
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be effective way losing 1.00
is effective 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(panting, be effective way losing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sweating, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(panting, be effective way losing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sweating, is effective)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(sweating, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(panting, be effective way losing)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(panting, is effective)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(panting, is effective)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(panting, is effective)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(panting, is effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(panting, be effective way losing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(panting, be effective way losing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sweating, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(panting, be effective way losing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)