paper towel: be at waste bin

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.69
, restroom
Weight: 0.66
, paper
Weight: 0.62
, towel
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, tissue
Weight: 0.56
, beach towel
Weight: 0.40
, trash bag
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at waste bin 1.00
be at in waste bin 1.00
be at garbage 0.83
be at trash 0.80
be one material that be recycle 0.78
be re-used by recycle them 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(paper, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at waste bin)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(paper, be at garbage)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(paper, be at waste bin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(paper, be at garbage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at waste bin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at garbage)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be at waste bin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(trash bag, be at trash)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(paper, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(paper, be at garbage)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(trash bag, be at trash)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(trash bag, be at trash)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tissue, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(tissue, be at waste bin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(paper towel, be at waste bin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(paper, be at waste bin)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be at garbage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tissue, be at waste bin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(trash bag, be at trash)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(paper, be at waste bin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(paper towel, be at waste bin)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(paper, be at garbage)