paper towel: clog toilets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.69
, restroom
Weight: 0.66
, paper
Weight: 0.62
, towel
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, tissue
Weight: 0.56
, bounty
Weight: 0.50
, beach towel
Weight: 0.40
, white paper
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
clog toilets 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, clog toilets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(paper towel, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(toilet paper, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, clog toilets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(paper towel, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(paper towel, clog toilets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(paper towel, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(paper towel, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, clog toilets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(paper towel, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(paper towel, clog toilets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, clog toilets)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(toilet paper, clog toilets)