paperclip: stick to magnets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.50
, project
Weight: 0.46
, desktop
Weight: 0.46
Siblings pencil
Weight: 0.33
, doorknob
Weight: 0.33
, paper clip
Weight: 0.33
, ballpoint pen
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
stick to magnets 1.00
be attracted to magnet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(paper clip, stick to magnets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(paper clip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(paper clip, stick to magnets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(paperclip, stick to magnets)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(paperclip, be attracted to magnet)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(paperclip, be attracted to magnet)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(paperclip, be attracted to magnet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(paperclip, be attracted to magnet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(paperclip, stick to magnets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(paperclip, stick to magnets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(paperclip, stick to magnets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(paper clip, stick to magnets)