Dice
About
Dialogues
Browse full collection
papilla
:
has quality bad
from
Quasimodo
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Related concepts
Parents
-
Siblings
-
Related properties
Property
Similarity
has quality bad
1.00
has quality system
0.82
has quality loss
0.79
is just superior
0.76
has quality function
0.76
has quality definition
0.75
Priors about this statement
Cues
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Joint
Necessity
Sufficiency
Implication
Entailment
Contradiction
Entropy
Evidence
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Plausible
Typical
Remarkable
Salient
Clauses
Salient implies Plausible
0.28
Rule weight:
0.28
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.98
Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.89
¬ Salient(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
Similarity expansion
0.68
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
0.82
Evidence:
0.98
Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.97
¬ Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality system
)
0.66
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.98
Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.99
¬ Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality loss
)
0.63
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.98
Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.98
¬ Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality function
)
0.63
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.98
Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.99
¬ Plausible(
papilla
,
is just superior
)
0.63
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
0.82
Evidence:
0.89
Salient(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.90
¬ Salient(
papilla
,
has quality system
)
0.63
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.98
Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.99
¬ Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality definition
)
0.60
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.89
Salient(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.98
¬ Salient(
papilla
,
has quality loss
)
0.58
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.84
Similarity weight:
0.82
Evidence:
0.75
Typical(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.66
¬ Typical(
papilla
,
has quality system
)
0.58
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.89
Salient(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.94
¬ Salient(
papilla
,
has quality function
)
0.58
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.89
Salient(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.95
¬ Salient(
papilla
,
is just superior
)
0.58
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.90
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.89
Salient(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.95
¬ Salient(
papilla
,
has quality definition
)
0.54
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.80
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.67
Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.61
¬ Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality loss
)
0.53
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.82
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.67
Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.54
¬ Remarkable(
papilla
,
is just superior
)
0.52
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.81
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.75
Typical(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.76
¬ Typical(
papilla
,
has quality function
)
0.52
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.74
Similarity weight:
0.82
Evidence:
0.67
Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.77
¬ Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality system
)
0.52
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.77
Similarity weight:
0.79
Evidence:
0.75
Typical(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.92
¬ Typical(
papilla
,
has quality loss
)
0.51
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.79
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.75
Typical(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.82
¬ Typical(
papilla
,
has quality definition
)
0.50
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.77
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.75
Typical(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.91
¬ Typical(
papilla
,
is just superior
)
0.50
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.77
Similarity weight:
0.75
Evidence:
0.67
Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.68
¬ Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality definition
)
0.49
Rule weight:
0.85
Evidence weight:
0.76
Similarity weight:
0.76
Evidence:
0.67
Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.73
¬ Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality function
)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight:
0.14
Evidence weight:
0.95
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.89
Salient(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.75
¬ Typical(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.67
¬ Remarkable(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
Typical implies Plausible
0.47
Rule weight:
0.48
Evidence weight:
0.98
Similarity weight:
1.00
Evidence:
0.98
Plausible(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)
⋁
Evidence:
0.75
¬ Typical(
papilla
,
has quality bad
)