para: is worth rocket league

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.46
, time
Weight: 0.32
, unit
Weight: 0.31
, read
Weight: 0.31
, country
Weight: 0.31
Siblings au
Weight: 0.29
, na
Weight: 0.29
, h
Weight: 0.28
, clause
Weight: 0.28
, parameter
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is worth rocket league 1.00
is rocket league 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(para, is worth rocket league)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(para, is rocket league)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(para, is rocket league)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(para, is rocket league)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(para, is rocket league)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(para, is worth rocket league)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(para, is worth rocket league)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(para, is worth rocket league)