paradox: were effective against medieval catholic church

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, term
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings liar
Weight: 0.50
, irony
Weight: 0.35
, duality
Weight: 0.34
, contradiction
Weight: 0.33
, dilemma
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were effective against medieval catholic church 1.00
were effective against medieval church 0.96
were effective against catholic church 0.96
were effective against church 0.89
be in theology 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(irony, were effective against medieval catholic church)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(irony, were effective against catholic church)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(irony, were effective against medieval church)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(irony, were effective against church)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(irony, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(irony, were effective against medieval catholic church)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(irony, were effective against catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(irony, were effective against catholic church)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(irony, were effective against medieval church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(irony, were effective against medieval church)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(irony, were effective against church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(irony, were effective against church)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(paradox, were effective against medieval church)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(paradox, were effective against catholic church)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(paradox, were effective against church)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(paradox, were effective against catholic church)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(paradox, were effective against catholic church)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(irony, were effective against medieval catholic church)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(irony, were effective against catholic church)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(irony, were effective against medieval church)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(paradox, were effective against medieval catholic church) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(irony, were effective against church)