paralegal: be involved with substantive review of agency action

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.60
, office worker
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, attorney
Weight: 0.57
Siblings accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.34
, clerk
Weight: 0.34
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, solicitor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be involved with substantive review of agency action 1.00
be involved with substantive judicial review of agency action 0.97
be involved with review of agency action 0.94
be involved with substantive review 0.94
be involved with judicial review of agency action 0.92
be involved with substantive judicial review 0.90
be involved with review 0.86
be involved with judicial review 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review of agency action)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with review of agency action)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review of agency action)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with review of agency action)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with judicial review of agency action)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review of agency action)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(paralegal, be involved with review of agency action)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with judicial review of agency action)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(paralegal, be involved with judicial review of agency action)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with review)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with review)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(paralegal, be involved with review)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(paralegal, be involved with judicial review)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review of agency action)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with judicial review)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(paralegal, be involved with judicial review)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with judicial review of agency action)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive judicial review)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with review of agency action)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with review)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with judicial review)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(paralegal, be involved with substantive review of agency action)