parent: fee pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sister
Weight: 0.66
, loser
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.62
Siblings neighbor
Weight: 0.62
, childhood
Weight: 0.56
, mom
Weight: 0.35
, mother
Weight: 0.34
, sibling
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fee pet 1.00
fee child 0.90
fee their child 0.88
kiss pet 0.76
wants to have small animal for fun 0.75
doctor sick pet 0.75
wants to play with puppy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mother, fee child)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mother, fee child)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mother, fee child)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(parent, fee pet)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(parent, fee their child)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(parent, fee child)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(parent, fee child)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(parent, fee their child)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(parent, fee child)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(parent, fee child)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(parent, fee their child)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(parent, fee their child)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(parent, fee pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(parent, fee pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(parent, fee pet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mother, fee child)