park: be in colorado

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in colorado 1.00
be set in colorado 0.95
be in florida 0.81
be cheap in florida 0.80
be expensive in montana 0.79
be in spain 0.78
be in detroit 0.78
be expensive in california 0.78
be in nyc 0.78
be cheap in detroit 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(property, be cheap in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be in colorado)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(property, be expensive in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be in colorado)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(property, be cheap in detroit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be in colorado)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(property, be cheap in florida)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(property, be cheap in detroit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(property, be expensive in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(property, be expensive in california)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(property, be cheap in florida)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(property, be cheap in detroit)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(central park, be in nyc)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(walt disney world, be in florida)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(property, be cheap in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(park, be in colorado)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(property, be expensive in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(park, be in colorado)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(property, be cheap in detroit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(park, be in colorado)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(walt disney world, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(walt disney world, be in florida)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(central park, be in nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(central park, be in nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(park, be in colorado)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be set in colorado)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(park, be set in colorado)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(park, be set in colorado)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(park, be set in colorado)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be in colorado)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(property, be cheap in detroit)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(property, be cheap in florida)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(property, be expensive in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(walt disney world, be in florida)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(central park, be in nyc)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(property, be cheap in florida)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(property, be cheap in detroit)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(park, be in colorado) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(property, be expensive in california)