park: has size large

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has size large 1.00
is big 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(park, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(central park, is big)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(central park, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(central park, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(park, has size large)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(park, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(park, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(park, has size large)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(park, has size large)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(park, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, is big)