park: have rules

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have rules 1.00
differ from rules 0.88
law of is law 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(attraction, law of is law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(park, have rules)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(property, differ from rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(park, have rules)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(property, differ from rules)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(attraction, law of is law)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(property, differ from rules)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(attraction, law of is law)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(property, differ from rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(park, have rules)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(attraction, law of is law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(park, have rules)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(park, have rules)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(park, have rules)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(park, have rules)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(property, differ from rules)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(attraction, law of is law)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(property, differ from rules)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(park, have rules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(attraction, law of is law)