park: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
become popular 0.91
is popular concept 0.83
is famous 0.78
be like facebook popular 0.77
be popular to tourist 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(site, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(site, be like facebook popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(site, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(site, be like facebook popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(site, is popular)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, be like facebook popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be popular to tourist)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(joshua tree, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(walt disney world, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central park, is popular)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(site, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, is popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(site, be like facebook popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(central park, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(walt disney world, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(walt disney world, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(joshua tree, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(joshua tree, is popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(walt disney world, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(walt disney world, is famous)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(park, is popular)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(park, is famous)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is famous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is famous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(park, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(site, is popular)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(site, be like facebook popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(death valley, be popular to tourist)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(joshua tree, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(central park, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(walt disney world, is popular)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(site, is popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(park, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(site, be like facebook popular)