park: were built

Related concepts

Parents	location Weight: 0.67 , playground Weight: 0.67 , site Weight: 0.66 , attraction Weight: 0.66 , property Weight: 0.63
Siblings	central park Weight: 0.89 , yellowstone national park Weight: 0.80 , death valley Weight: 0.68 , joshua tree Weight: 0.67 , walt disney world Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were built	1.00
was built	0.96
is built	0.94
be like these built	0.87
be built between man	0.82
were created	0.80
was built on fault	0.79
be developed	0.77
was reconstructed in south	0.76
were formed	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(playground, is built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(park, were built)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(attraction, be built between man) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(park, were built)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(property, be developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(park, were built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(playground, is built)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(attraction, be built between man)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(property, be developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(playground, is built)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(attraction, be built between man)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(property, be developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(central park, was built)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(walt disney world, was built on fault)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(playground, is built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(park, were built)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(attraction, be built between man) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(park, were built)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(property, be developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(park, were built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(central park, was built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(central park, was built)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(walt disney world, was built on fault) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(walt disney world, was built on fault)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(park, were built)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(park, was built)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(park, was built)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(park, was built)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(park, was built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(park, were built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(playground, is built)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(attraction, be built between man)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(property, be developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(central park, was built)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(walt disney world, was built on fault)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(playground, is built)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(attraction, be built between man)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(park, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(property, be developed)