parole: be ethical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prisoner
Weight: 0.56
, sentence
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.54
, consideration
Weight: 0.54
, reason
Weight: 0.54
Siblings imprisonment
Weight: 0.34
, prison guard
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.32
, bail
Weight: 0.32
, cardiac arrest
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ethical 1.00
is ethical 1.00
be important in ethics 0.85
is ethically wrong 0.82
be as requirements for ethics 0.80
is unethical 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reason, be important in ethics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(parole, be ethical)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reason, be as requirements for ethics)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(parole, be ethical)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(reason, be as requirements for ethics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(reason, be important in ethics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(reason, be as requirements for ethics)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(reason, be important in ethics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is ethically wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is ethical)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(capital punishment, is unethical)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reason, be important in ethics)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(parole, be ethical)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reason, be as requirements for ethics)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(parole, be ethical)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(capital punishment, is ethical)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is ethical)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(capital punishment, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is ethically wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(capital punishment, is unethical)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(capital punishment, is unethical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(parole, be ethical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(parole, be ethical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(reason, be as requirements for ethics)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(reason, be important in ethics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is ethical)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is unethical)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(capital punishment, is ethically wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(reason, be as requirements for ethics)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(parole, be ethical)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(reason, be important in ethics)