parole: has state failure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prisoner
Weight: 0.56
, sentence
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.54
, consideration
Weight: 0.54
, reason
Weight: 0.54
Siblings imprisonment
Weight: 0.34
, prison guard
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.32
, bail
Weight: 0.32
, cardiac arrest
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state failure 1.00
be considered failure 0.91
has state problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cardiac arrest, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(parole, has state failure)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(parole, be considered failure)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(parole, be considered failure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(parole, be considered failure)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(parole, be considered failure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(parole, has state failure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(parole, has state failure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(parole, has state failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cardiac arrest, has state problem)