parole: is target

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prisoner
Weight: 0.56
, sentence
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.54
, consideration
Weight: 0.54
, reason
Weight: 0.54
Siblings imprisonment
Weight: 0.34
, prison guard
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.32
, bail
Weight: 0.32
, cardiac arrest
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is target 1.00
is easy target 0.90
is political target 0.87
is easy political target 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(parole, is target)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(parole, is easy target)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(parole, is easy target)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(parole, is easy target)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, is political target)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(parole, is political target)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(parole, is easy political target)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(parole, is easy political target)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(parole, is easy political target)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(parole, is easy target)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(parole, is easy political target)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(parole, is political target)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(parole, is political target)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(parole, is target)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parole, is target) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(parole, is target)