part: be important to whole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heating element
Weight: 0.68
, step
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.65
, figure
Weight: 0.64
, hub
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to whole 1.00
rest in another 0.78
be in one part 0.78
is us 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(part, be important to whole)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(part, be in one part)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(part, rest in another)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(part, is us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(part, be in one part)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(part, rest in another)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(part, is us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(part, be in one part)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(part, rest in another)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(part, is us)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(part, rest in another)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(part, be in one part)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(part, is us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(part, be important to whole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(part, be important to whole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(part, be important to whole)