parthenon: was burned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, monument
Weight: 0.53
, temple
Weight: 0.51
, building
Weight: 0.49
, site
Weight: 0.47
Siblings national monument
Weight: 0.28
, pyramid
Weight: 0.28
, system
Weight: 0.28
, empire state building
Weight: 0.28
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
was burned 1.00
was burned down 0.96
is destroyed 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(temple, is destroyed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(parthenon, was burned)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(temple, is destroyed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(temple, is destroyed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(temple, is destroyed)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(parthenon, was burned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(parthenon, was burned)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(parthenon, was burned down)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(parthenon, was burned down)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(parthenon, was burned down)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(parthenon, was burned down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(parthenon, is destroyed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(parthenon, is destroyed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(parthenon, is destroyed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(parthenon, is destroyed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(parthenon, was burned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(parthenon, was burned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(temple, is destroyed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(parthenon, was burned)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(temple, is destroyed)