party: be on red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents birthday party
Weight: 0.86
, political party
Weight: 0.82
, third party
Weight: 0.77
, socialist party
Weight: 0.77
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.95
, conservative party
Weight: 0.84
, communist party
Weight: 0.83
, liberal party
Weight: 0.82
, democratic party
Weight: 0.81

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on red 1.00
has color red 0.90
be on south red 0.89
be on down south red 0.87
has color yellow 0.84
be on rated red 0.83
be on down south rated red 0.83
has color blue 0.82
be on south rated red 0.82
has color green 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has color yellow)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has color blue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(conservative party, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has color yellow)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(conservative party, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has color blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(party, be on red)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(party, has color red)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(party, has color yellow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(party, has color red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(party, has color blue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(party, has color red)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(party, be on red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(party, be on red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(conservative party, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(party, be on red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(conservative party, has color blue)