pasta: be hot or cold

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.64
, favorite
Weight: 0.63
, starch
Weight: 0.63
, staple
Weight: 0.62
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, lasagna
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, macaroni
Weight: 0.37
, steak
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hot or cold 1.00
be spicy hot 0.82
be stream hot 0.80
be hard to find in winter 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be hard to find in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pasta, be hot or cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food, be hard to find in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(food, be hard to find in winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be hard to find in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pasta, be hot or cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pasta, be hot or cold)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(pasta, be stream hot)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be stream hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pasta, be stream hot)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pasta, be stream hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be hot or cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pasta, be hot or cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food, be hard to find in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pasta, be hot or cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food, be hard to find in winter)