pasta: be load with carbohydrate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.64
, favorite
Weight: 0.63
, starch
Weight: 0.63
, staple
Weight: 0.62
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, lasagna
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, macaroni
Weight: 0.37
, steak
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be load with carbohydrate 1.00
be high in protein 0.77
has nutrient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(food, has nutrient)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(food, has nutrient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(food, has nutrient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steak, be high in protein)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(food, has nutrient)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steak, be high in protein)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(steak, be high in protein)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, has nutrient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(steak, be high in protein)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(pasta, be load with carbohydrate)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, has nutrient)