pate: is high risk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.61
, vegetable
Weight: 0.50
, item
Weight: 0.49
, liver
Weight: 0.47
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, ravioli
Weight: 0.37
, polenta
Weight: 0.37
, steak
Weight: 0.36
, fried egg
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is high risk food 1.00
is risk food 0.96
is high 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(steak, is high)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(steak, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(steak, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(pate, is high risk food)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pate, is risk food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pate, is risk food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(pate, is risk food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pate, is high)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pate, is risk food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pate, is high)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pate, is high)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pate, is high)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pate, is high risk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pate, is high risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pate, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(steak, is high)