patent: be important in market economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in market economy 1.00
be important to business 0.81
be important to society 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(invention, be important to society)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(invention, be important to society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(invention, be important to society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(patent, be important in market economy)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important to business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(patent, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(patent, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important in market economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(patent, be important in market economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(patent, be important in market economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(invention, be important to society)