patent: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is thing 0.94
be good bad 0.87
has quality bad 0.79
be like annoyatron annoying 0.76
is funny 0.76
happen 0.75
change way 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(patent, is bad thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(development, happen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(patent, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(development, happen)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(development, happen)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(invention, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(invention, change way)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(invention, happen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(patent, is bad thing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(development, happen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(patent, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(invention, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(invention, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(invention, happen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(invention, happen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(invention, change way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(invention, change way)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(algorithm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(patent, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(patent, is thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(patent, is thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(patent, be good bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(patent, be good bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(patent, be good bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(patent, be good bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(patent, is thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(patent, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(patent, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(patent, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(patent, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(patent, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(patent, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(development, happen)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(invention, happen)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(invention, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(invention, change way)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(algorithm, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(development, happen)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(patent, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)