patent: is written

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.58
Siblings invention
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.32
, application
Weight: 0.32
, network device
Weight: 0.32
, algorithm
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is written 1.00
have written laws 0.81
is written vaguely 0.79
written in multiple languages 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(application, written in multiple languages)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(application, written in multiple languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(application, written in multiple languages)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(patent, is written)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(patent, have written laws)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(patent, is written vaguely)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(patent, have written laws)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(patent, have written laws)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(patent, have written laws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(patent, is written vaguely)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(patent, is written vaguely)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(patent, is written vaguely)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(patent, is written)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(patent, is written)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(patent, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(application, written in multiple languages)