path: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.59
, string
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.57
Siblings route
Weight: 0.68
, trail
Weight: 0.62
, shape
Weight: 0.58
, boulder
Weight: 0.56
, wicca
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be defined as walkway through forest 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(path, be at park)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(path, be defined as walkway through forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(path, be defined as walkway through forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(path, be defined as walkway through forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(path, be defined as walkway through forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(path, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(path, be at park)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(path, be at park)